Thursday, May 6, 2010
The Issue of the Death Penalty
In a discussion of the Republican party on Sourcewatch.org, the Republican's view on the death penalty is discussed. Many Republicans view the death penalty as necessary because they think that it is truly the only way to cope with seriously criminal individuals.
Most Democrats do not believe that the death penalty is necessary or that it is an ethical response to crimes. In this discussion of the views of the Democratic party, their general view on the death penalty is discussed. The Democrats do not believe that the death penalty is something that should be practiced, many Democrats believe that death in response to killing is not the right answer,
On this issue I am fully in agreement with the Democrats. I do not believe that the death penalty is an appropriate response to any crime. The death penalty prevents criminals from ever having the opportunity to repent for their crimes. I am not saying that remorseful murderers should go free, however I do believe that it is incorrect to deprive incarcerated individuals of their remaining years, because those remaining years, even if they are spent in jail, could provide the individual with an opportunity to redeem them self in some small way.
The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Democrat Party
1.) The Democratic Party is in many ways more tolerant, more diverse and more aware of the issues of constituents from all different backgrounds. This blog representing the Utah State Democratic Party is undoubtedly biased, however it does make some good points about the differences in diversity between the two parties. I believe that diversity is an important component of being able to make decisions that are best for everyone in the country.
2.) The Democrats are also much more willing to acknowledge issues like global warming and gay marriage. Although these issues are entirely different, they both represent issues that require a stretch from the "norm", something that Democrats in general are definitely better at than Republicans are. In this article published a while ago in The Washington Post the Democrat's vow to combat Global Warming is discussed. This is one of the main reason that I prefer to identify myself as a Democrat, I believe that it is important to keep an open mind when it comes to issues like people's life style choices and the possible damage we are doing to our planet. Neither of these issues are cut and dry, they are worthy of plenty of consideration.
The main weakness of the Democratic Party in my opinion is that they are often not as firm in their opinions as the Republicans are. In an article published on the NPR website, this weakness in the Democratic Party is discussed. The Democrats need to become more confident in their ideas and more sure of their strengths, because otherwise they will fall prey to the Republicans' constant "no's"
The Strengths and Weaknesses of the Republican Party
The main problems that I have with the Republican party are as follows:
1.) The Republican Party has in many ways become "The Party of NO!", in that they simply turn down or stone wall any ideas the Democrats have. In an Op Ed Column in the Washington Post, columnist Harold Meyerson discusses the health care bill (the column was published in January, but it supports my point well). Meyerson says that as their main contribution to the bill, the "Republicans will attack the law's weaknesses (and strengths)". No where does it say that they will offer constructive criticism. The Republicans as a party do not offer solutions it seems, they only attack the solutions of their opposition.
2.) The Republican Party is, in many respects, driven by it's fringe. The most vocal representatives of the party in the media are men like Glen Beck, Bill O' Reilly and Rush Limbaugh, who do not seem to be at all well educated about the issues they are broadcasting to a public who laps up everything they say. In an article in The Daily Camera, writer and author Lou Dubose is quoted as saying "They're entitled to their own opinions, not to inject falsehoods and outright lies into the news cycle", and this is very true. Some of the main news sources for Republicans nationwide are not even news sources, they are opinion shows. In the same article a program is discussed called "Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh and O'Reilly: The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse". All I have to say is that they seem about equivalent to war, pestilence, famine and death...
However, enough knocking the Republicans! They do have their strengths, one of their main positive aspects being that they have faith in their constituents. While recently reading an article in The Washington Post about the tragic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, I realized something. Although it was not at all the main focus of the article it became apparent to me that the Republicans trust the people to play a larger role than the Democrats trust them to in many respects. This faith in the intelligence of citizens is heartening, although it is counter intuitive since media outlets like FOX news are feeding people big servings of idiot pills every day..
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
"The Handcuffs are Off.."
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Community Service Paper
For many people in nations all over our world, homelessness is an ever present or looming issue. According to an article titled "The Geography of Homelessness" published on the website of the National Alliance to End Homelessness, there were approximately 671,859 men, women and children living as homeless people in the United States in 2007. For my community service project and during my research I decided to put special emphasis on San Francisco and the Bay area since it is my home region, and also because it is the area that I know best in our country. Currently the Bay Area is home to many thousands of homeless men, women and children, with my home county of Contra Costa having the eleventh highest population of homeless people in the entire nation. Right now San Francisco is home to several thousand “hard core” homeless, men and women who live in between the streets and homeless shelters year round. The many tragic facets of their day to day lives are discussed in a series called "Shame of the City" by Kevin Fagan of the San Francisco Chronicle. After reading the five installments of this series and digesting the information in each one I feel that I have gained much more perspective on the issue of homelessness and that I have a better understanding of how people feel about living without the security of a residence. Below is a photograph of the Silver family, a couple and their two children, who live out of their van in San Francisco. This family is an anomaly in that they are an entire family unit living together on the street. When thinking of the homeless I, like many others, think of lone men and women panhandling. It had barely occurred to me that there are in fact entire families who wake up on the street, send their kids to school, and live their lives as a unit just like mine, except that they are permanently without a roof over their heads.
I know that the problem of homelessness is a vast one, and that it is very important for residents of the bay area as a community to ensure that we are making progress towards alleviating the dire situations that many of our fellow citizens have become entangled in.
Sadly, many people in the community have very negative attitudes towards homeless people, often considering them to be lazy or shiftless, and saying things like “If they would just get a job..” not realizing that it is not always that simple. Disparaging remarks like these are quite often unfair because many of the men and women who are living on the streets are in their predicament because of problems with drug abuse or mental instability, two conditions which are very difficult to overcome without help. Many residents of San Francisco have come to view the homeless more or less as a plight on their city instead of as the desperate human beings that they are, which is truly tragic because without some perseverance and passion to help, the situation will never change.
Part II
Unfortunately it has been particularly difficult for a solution to this issue to be formulated in our area. The bay area (one of the areas in our nation with the most severe problems relating to homelessness) has not been particularly effective at obtaining and utilizing federal aid for the homeless because the government is wary of awarding cities funds if they do not have a solid plan to address their issue of homelessness. According to the following graphic, featured in a blog by Richard Shabazz on The Examiner.com, California is inadequately prepared to cope with their problems with homelessness, our state is in fact in the bottom third for preparedness, although we have one of the most insurmountable epidemics of homelessness.
In the fifth installment of the "Shame of the City" series, the author discussed the stunning fact that the city of San Francisco has as many as 5,000 "hard core" homeless men and women, and a population of about 800,000 overall, while New York (a city with a population of 8 million!) has a hardcore homeless population of less than 2,000. This disparity in the ratio between homeless population and overall population is due almost entirely to the fact that New York has been much more adept at utilizing government funding to remedy their situation with homelessness. The national government obviously does not want people to live on the streets, however since Regan was president and many men and women who were residing in mental institutions were in essence “turned loose” onto the streets, the problem of homelessness has become exponentially more grave. The local government in the Bay Area really needs to develop and solidify a competent plan for combating homelessness and present it to the federal government so that our region can receive the much needed federal funds to begin solving the crisis of homelessness in our area.
For my community service project, I donated two consecutive Saturday mornings and afternoons of my time to work at one of the Habitat for Humanity build sites in the bay area. The build site that I worked at on those two days was located on Edes Avenue in East Oakland. I was wary of venturing into East Oakland at first, being a sheltered suburban girl I had only driven through East Oakland on the way to the airport, and have been warned to be cautious on BART if I am passing through that area. Thankfully however, my opinions have been changed and I have realized that areas like East Oakland need to be improved, and that volunteers should not be wary of going to help. The families who live in East Oakland, just like in any intimidating area, should not be neglected or punished simply because of where they were forced to settle.
The organization Habitat for Humanity has developed a construction site on a lot near the train tracks, and they are in the process of building a lovely community with several really pretty, eco-friendly houses at the Edes Avenue site, and families without homes will be able to move into them. One of the pre-requisites for moving into one of the homes is that the family must work a minimum of 500 hours at the build site, which is really cool because then the families get to meet and interact with the volunteers working to build their future dream homes. In my opinion this program is really amazing because it basically provides families in difficult situations with the opportunity to work hard and earn themselves a beautiful, secure, new home.
Part III
For the issue of homelessness to be improved upon many things need to be set in motion. This is not really an issue which can ever be permanently resolved, but the governments in any area with a homeless population need to begin to take action. Plans to improve life for people currently living on the streets must be set in motion and local, as well as federal, governments must take responsibility and become culpable for the well being of the many human lives being affected negatively by the issue of homelessness. Also, individual citizens need to realize that we are a community. People need to understand that if someone is sleeping on a street corner, in the pouring rain, with nothing but a threadbare sleeping bad for warmth, they need help, regardless of whether they are lazy or industrious, or if they should be considered crazy or sane, they are a human being is suffering, and it is our responsibility as fellow human beings to do everything in our power to provide that man or woman with a brighter future. The citizens of the world must be shaken up and forced to recognize that their fellow human beings are suffering and that collectively it is in our power to change things.
After my experience at Habitat for Humanity, and after seeing the multitude of volunteers who had come out to donate their Saturdays, I am hopeful. I firmly believe that if enough people in a community have the desire to dramatically alter the circumstances of their neighbors for the better they will be able to. In my cumulative 15 hours of service I was able to paint wood that would soon enough be turned into somebody's home, and I was able to work together with the future occupants to erect the walls of a home. I have never been a very technical person, but at the Habitat for Humanity build site I felt like I was really making a difference.
I will definitely be returning soon to put in a few shifts at the Edes Avenue build site or any other build sites in our area. I have participated in several community service organizations, and Habitat for Humanity was one of the first during which I actually felt like I was trusted to contribute something valuable. At many organizations it seems to be more about marketing, or about simply putting in ones hours to complete their "civic duty". At Habitat for Humanity however, I felt like everything was different. Habitat for Humanity effectively creates a community of people who have the common goal of providing every family with the home that they deserve. I am so very glad that I had the opportunity to participate with this organization and that I had both opportunities to put in some time and labor at the build site. Hopefully many other people will realize how valuable it is to participate in an organization like Habitat for Humanity, and they too will be able to experience how awesome it is to work with your hands and actually see what you have created at the end of the day, and to know that your hard work will make a difference.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
The Similarities between Obama and Sarkozy..
Where Do People Volunteer?

March 27th
I had an amazing time at both of my shifts and I feel like I will definitely be returning to volunteer my time for some shifts this summer.
Saturday March 20th
The Habitat for Humanity fact sheet page pretty much outlines the program and I found it to be an excellent source of information prior to beginning work
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
Poor Polar Bears :(
Progression in Nuclear Arms Eradication
Aid To the Homeless in Contra Costa County
Edes Avenue Habitat for Humanity Project
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Couple Shot Dead in Cold Blood
Shame of the City part 5
The fifth and final installment of the "Shame of the City" series discusses the lack of a plan in San Francisco. In recent years San Francisco passed the Care Not Cash bill, which offers the homeless services instead of welfare payments, which can arguably be used to purchase drugs or other harmful things. San Francisco needs to offer more shelter.
In New York there are less than two thousand homeless living on the streets, while San Francisco has almost 5,000 hardcore homeless. New York has 8 million inhabitants and San Francisco has 800,000, this discrepancy in homeless population with regards to total population is ridiculous. San Francisco has one of the worst problems in the entire country, and although California is well known for its altruistic citizens, and liberal "hippie" attitudes, the people in need of help are not being aided.
Shame of the City Part 4
Also sympathetic passerby handing out money to the homeless often provide the men and women with means to purchase their daily supply of crack or heroin.
San Francisco needs to figure out a more viable plan for dealing with the problem of homelessness.
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
SHUT UP LINDSAY LOHAN!
Does the First Amendment Cover Funerals?
In my opinion the First Amendment should not permit protesters to picket private events like funerals or memorial services. Whether or not someone has freedom of speech, they should not be permitted to intrude on events such as funerals with their opinions on the deceased's life or actions.
The funniest video ever....
Shame of the City- Part 3
When everyone enters the shelter they are handed a thin, gray wool blanket and instructed to pick a three inch thick mat on the floor. Many of the people inside bring in alcohol and drugs like crack. Pretty much as long as an individual is not obnoxious, they can get away with breaking any rule. The shelter is used as a night time haven for many, drug users and innocents, who are happy to have a roof over their heads and a plate of nutritious (albeit not tasty) cafeteria food to eat.
Everyone morning by 7am everyone is gone and the shelter is deserted until the following afternoon at 4:30 when everything began again. The shelter offers support groups and tuberculosis testing, because living in the congregational setting puts the men and women at high risk for the illness.
Although many insist that they are too terrified to spend a night in the violent drug den of a shelter, there are really relatively few disturbances and 75% of shelter guests are satisfied with their safety and treatment.
The Shame of the City, or the Victims of Society?-Part Two

Tuesday, March 2, 2010
The Shame of the City, or the Victims of Society?-Part One
Part one of the series is called "The Island", this segment is about a 40 by 70 foot traffic island between 12th and Mission Street and South Van Nuys Avenue. The segment describes the everyday tragedies experienced by the collection of homeless people using the traffic island as a home base who spend their days pan handling and doing other things to get money. The article describes the death of the so-called leader of traffic Island, a man named Tommy. Like approximately 170 other homeless people a year Tommy lived and died on the streets, he contracted necrotizing fasciitis and soon thereafter died. Tommy was a heroin addict who taught the other residents of the Island how to pan handle most effectively and looked out for the others.
Tommy is just one example of the many people who have succumbed to homelessness, as are the others on the Island. Many are prostitutes, several are one legged, and almost all of them are drug users ( a majority use crack and/or heroin). These people are often ignored or even abused by the people who walk by them on the sidewalk, when they really just need counseling or healing. Those classified as "hard core" homeless don't want help though and that is the main problem. One of the men living on the Island was so against receiving any outside help that he krazy glued his skin when it split instead of going to a doctor.
On a good day the panhandlers can make about $40, which is almost always put towards a $10 crack rock or a $20 bag of heroin, and that is quite often the best that they strive for.
Homelessness is a terrible tragedy and as the story of the men and women who live on the Island shows, the homeless are individuals who want a better life, they are all somebodies son or daughter and they all were children who were full of potential at one point.
The People of America Vs. Insurance
Now it seems like people pay for insurance every month, for their cars, homes and themselves, but then are scared to use it. People get into car accidents and then pay for the damage out of pocket because they are terrified to have their insurance deductibles raised sky high. The same thing is happening with medical care and that is terrible.
Friday, February 26, 2010
The Hellish Healthcare Hassle
The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
Bipartisan Health Care Reform Summit 2010 | ||||
http://www.thedailyshow.com/ | ||||
|
I have to laugh uproariously at how perfectly John Stewart sums up the way our nation works. Overall I completely agree with him, we have a problem and its ludicrously and hilariously tragic that we are too busy squabbling to tug ourselves out of the quagmire.
As a nation we need to cut the bull shit, and recognize that we are in a sinking ship and that no amount of arguing is going to set us afloat again. Whether or not one party asserts itself as the alpha dog over the other is irrelevant because when the ship goes down both parties will still be on it, probably still pointing fingers and hollering at eachother as the water swallows them up.
America needs to realize that we are going down hill, that it is hard to hold onto a job these days, and that it is even harder to grapple with the gorgon of skyrocketing health care costs. In addition to these economic problems, we are facing a tidal wave of health issues, from the overwhelming number of people eating themselves into diabetes, to the millions who are slowly poisoning themselves with cigarettes. Now I am not saying that people should be condemned for bad habits, however any government that will sit idly by and watch it's people suffer should indeed be condemned for this laxness in morality. The government should now more than ever, provide a viable universal health plan for all Americans. Everyone in our nation should be able to be healed and taken care of when they are sick or injured, and no one should have to sacrifice just because the basic necessity of medical care is out of their price range.
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
US Department of Housing and Urban Development
Not Enough Preparation for Homeless Kids
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
Happy Ending for a Homeless Man

Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Lets Make America Thin Again

Humanity for Haiti
Monday, February 8, 2010
Evil Eggplant?
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Habitat for Humanity Success stories
All Hail President Palin...

Thursday, January 28, 2010
Death of J.D Salinger
Salinger's last work was published in 1965, and after the publication of The Catcher in the Rye, Salinger lived a very reclusive and mysterious life. I think that it's sad that such an influential American author lived a life that remains such a mystery.
More than a spousal sympathy bump..
Secret Terrorist Peace Talks?

Thursday, January 7, 2010
If we can't use them, no one can.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
A Christmas Near-Tragedy
My Community Service will be.. (drumroll please!)

Tuesday, January 5, 2010
You can get married now! Psych..

Monday, January 4, 2010
Do Scanners Break Child Pornography laws?
